Table 2 Risk of Bias using JBI critical appraisal checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses
JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | 1. Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated? | 2. Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question? | 3. Was the search strategy appropriate? | 4. Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate? | 5. Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate? | 6. Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently? | 7. Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction? | 8. Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? | 9. Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? | 10. Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data? | 11. Were the specific directives for new research appropriate? | Overall appraisal |
Brown et al. (2014) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Include |
Waheed et al. (2020) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Include |
Waheed et al. (2015) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N/A | Y | Y | Include |
Woodal et al. (2010) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Uncertain | Uncertain | Y | N | Y | Y | Include |
Hussain-Gambles et al. (2004) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Uncertain | Uncertain | Y | N | Y | Y | Include |
Symonds et al. (2012) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Include |
Liljas et al. (2017) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Include |
Spencer et al. (2022) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Include |
Bodicoat et al. (2021) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Include |
Bonevski et al. (2014) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Include |
Masood et al. (2019) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Include |