Table 4 Source of mosquito ITNs in various study households inMpanda and Kisarawe district by household economic status group
Source of Net | Socio economic groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poorest | Very poor | Poor | Less Poor | Least Poor | Conc. Index | |
1. Mpanda (N = 369) overall | (N = 77) | (N = 71) | (N = 67) | (N = 75) | (N = 79) | |
Proportion %(N)[95% CI] | ||||||
Free Nets | 66.2%(51)[54.6-76.6] | 78.9%56)[67.6-87.7] | 61.2%(41)[48.5-72.9] | 61.3%(46)[49.4-72.9] | 46.8%(37)[35.5-58.4] | -0.064 |
Commercial | 27.3%(21)[17.7-38.6] | 19.7%(14)[11.2-30.9] | 31.3%(21) [20.6-43.8] | 25.3%(19)[16.0-36.7] | 50.6%(40)[39.1-62.1] | 0.156 |
Social Market | 2.6%(2)[0.3-9.1] | 0.00 | 4.5%(3) [0.9-12.5] | 2.7%(2)[0.3-9.3] | 2.5%(2)[0.3-8.8] | 0.172 |
Other Source | 3.9%(3)[0.8-11.0] | 1.4%(1) [0.04-7.6] | 2.9% (2) [0.4-10.4] | 10.7%(8)[4.7-19.9] | 0.00 | 0.04 |
2.Kisarawe (N = 207))overall | (N = 25) | (N = 26) | (N = 40) | (N = 45) | (N = 71) | |
Proportion %(N)[95% CI] | ||||||
Free Nets | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Commercial | 16.0%(4)[4.5-36.1] | 42.3%(11)[23.4-63.1] | 50.0%(20)[33.8-66.2] | 51.1%(23)[35.8-66.3] | 50.7%(36)[38.6-62.8] | 0.269 |
Social Market | 68.0%(17)[46.5-85.1] | 46.2%(12)[26.6-66.6] | 45.0%(18)[29.0-61.5] | 28.9%(13)[16.4-44.3] | 36.6%(26)[25.5-49.9] | 0.003 |
Other Source | 16.0%(4)[4.5-36.1] | 11.5%(3)[2.4-30.2] | 5.0%(2)[4.2-26.8] | 20.0% (9)[8.0-32.1] | 12.7%(9)[6.0-22.7] | 0.179 |